Protecting expression, gatherings, and protests where government must follow the First Amendment.
Speech, assembly, and protest are central to how communities raise concerns and seek change. When government actors restrict these rights based on the message, the speaker, or the group, constitutional protections are implicated. Jump Start Legal Justice Center represents clients in federal matters involving speech restrictions, protest limits, and unequal access to public spaces.
We handle free speech, assembly, and protest matters for:
Activists and community organizers planning marches, vigils, or demonstrations
Religious and advocacy organizations engaging in public outreach or events
Students, faculty, and campus groups affected by speech codes or facility access rules
Individuals who face penalties or exclusion because of what they say, write, or display in public forums
Even if your event has not yet occurred, early legal advice can help reduce risk and preserve your rights.
First Amendment disputes arise in many settings. The following are common patterns we see.
Permits And Routes: Permit schemes or route assignments that appear neutral on paper but are applied more strictly to certain viewpoints or groups.
Time, Place, And Manner Limits: Curfews, sound limits, or location rules enforced unevenly, especially when similar secular or favored events are treated differently.
Designated Public Forums: Restrictions on leafleting, tabling, signs, or displays in public areas where the government has opened a forum for expression.
Campus Speech And Events: Speaker disinvitations, security fee requirements, or facility denials that target particular messages, causes, or viewpoints.
Retaliation And Selective Enforcement: Arrests, citations, or disciplinary actions used in response to protected speech or protest activity rather than neutral enforcement.
Whether a particular rule or enforcement action violates the First Amendment depends on the specific facts and the forum involved.
The First Amendment does not guarantee that every message will be popular or welcomed, but it limits how government may regulate speech and assembly. In many public spaces, the government must avoid content based or viewpoint based restrictions and must apply time, place, and manner limits in a neutral and narrowly tailored way.
Courts look at where the speech occurs, how the rules are written, and how they are enforced. They also consider whether similar events or messages are treated more favorably. We examine each of these factors when evaluating potential claims.
In some matters, the best outcome is to prevent a constitutional problem before it occurs. We advise organizers and organizations in advance about permit processes, proposed routes, and reasonable conditions so they can make informed choices and document their interactions with officials.
When a protest, event, or campaign is already underway and rights have been limited or violated, we assess the available federal claims, the urgency of any needed relief, and whether to seek court intervention. We also consider how litigation may affect ongoing advocacy efforts and public communications.
Review proposed events, permits, and conditions before you proceed
Identify potential First Amendment concerns and ways to document them
Evaluate whether government actions were content based, viewpoint based, or selectively enforced
Coordinate trial and, if needed, appellate strategy to address recurring issues
If you contact us about a free speech, assembly, or protest concern, we will typically ask for:
A timeline of events, including communications with officials
Copies of permits, applications, denial letters, or conditions imposed
Any written policies or ordinances cited by the government
Photos, videos, or other documentation of how rules were enforced on the ground
We use this information to evaluate whether the matter fits our federal practice and whether a consultation or further review is appropriate. A consultation or review does not create an attorney client relationship. No representation begins unless and until a written fee agreement is signed.
If you believe a government policy or decision is burdening sincere religious practice or treating religious activity less favorably than similar secular activity, it is important to understand what the law requires and what steps are available. An initial review can help determine whether federal religious freedom protections may apply.

This website is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this site or contacting Jump Start Legal Justice Center does not create an attorney client relationship. No attorney client relationship exists unless and until a written fee agreement is signed. Attorney licensed in Texas. Board Certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.